FPV HUB

Members => Build Threads => Topic started by: Gundummy on May 29, 2011, 07:42:00 PM

Title: New Member Build - with Q's
Post by: Gundummy on May 29, 2011, 07:42:00 PM
Gents thanks for your patience in advance,

       I posted an intro in the New Member forum but would like to share where i'm at right now as i think i need more help than i care to admit  :-[ I will keep everything in a "bullet point" fashion so its easier to quote or give valued input. 

Title: Re: New Member Build - with Q's
Post by: g.collins on May 29, 2011, 08:22:38 PM
From what I can gather, Standard 2.4g rang is a bit mystical and I could never get a strat answer 800 meters ish maybe who knows,  I first looked in to rang improvement on my 2.4g Spektrum, it involved using a Indoor High Power 1000mW 1W WiFi WLAN Wireless Signal Booster Amplifier 802.11b/g 11g, that I boult from Amazon, ther are some good fred's on hooking this up, on theresa forms, of course I think its totally illegal and I didn't bother in the end, and switched back to 35mhz for FPV.
the rest of your questions are probably left to more experience flyers of FPV on this form.
try this link.
http://diydrones.com/profiles/blogs/how-to-boost-your-24ghz?id=705844%3ABlogPost%3A123599&page=4 (http://diydrones.com/profiles/blogs/how-to-boost-your-24ghz?id=705844%3ABlogPost%3A123599&page=4)
regards Gordon
Title: Re: New Member Build - with Q's
Post by: Coyote on May 29, 2011, 08:22:43 PM
To help you get started, make sure you have some time to kill then sit down with a cuppa and watch this :

http://www.fpvuk.org/forum/index.php?action=media;sa=item;in=16 (http://www.fpvuk.org/forum/index.php?action=media;sa=item;in=16)

Andy does very well to try to explain some of the theory behind using antenna.

If your on 2.4ghz control in the Uk your then limited to 5.8ghz video use only legally. Not carbon friendly, so the vtx antenna if possible is best out on the rear of the tail, keeping away from the frame

The camera location is flexible, some like it straight on the nose, other between the landing gear. As long as you can cure the vibrations your good

Range for 2.4ghz is LOS or a little more.

Title: Re: New Member Build - with Q's
Post by: Gundummy on May 30, 2011, 01:48:09 PM
Thanks for the feedback,

             I think it's safe to say my Video setup range far exceeds my Futaba's capabilities!

Coyote, Thx for the Vid, it explained a lot, just waiting for a few odds and ends then i will carryout a range check and go from there.

I don't think there is an easy way of doing this apart from jumping right in! 
Title: Re: New Member Build - with Q's
Post by: Gundummy on June 05, 2011, 12:01:27 PM
Just an afterthought,

                         Something i wasn't aware of was the myth of Tx Power Vs Rx Power. I have 3dbi (supposedly) antennas on both tx and rx.

1.   If i were to place a 5dbi antenna on the rx, what would be the overall benefit?
2.   Does an increase in Dbi on the rx mean more power will be drawn?
3.   I read somewhere NOT to put the say "5dbi" on the Tx - why is this?

thanks for all the assistance with the noob q's  :P
Title: Re: New Member Build - with Q's
Post by: Coyote on June 05, 2011, 12:25:55 PM
If you put a 5dbi antenna on your rx being higher gain its range over the vertical plane will increase, expect less than twice the range. But increasing the gain though decreases the antennas pattern in the vertical plane, making the pattern more disk shaped.

Bearing in mind that the omni is normally mounted vertically and on the ground, the vertical plane being reduced is a disadvantage, not an advantage, the higher up the plane the greater the cance of signal loss. It is also worse for db loss in manouvers as well

No, no extra power is drawn, the antenna is still a 50 ohm load. Db refers to the pattern of the antenna not the resistance

Now you can see the disadvantage of having that pattern on the floor, having that disadvantage on the plane is much much worse, as the plane is in constant motion, increasing the potential for total signal loss 
Title: Re: New Member Build - with Q's
Post by: Gundummy on June 10, 2011, 08:59:45 PM
Thanks again Coyote

A few more items arrived the other day,  ^-^

I am getting nearer to my first flight, not long now...... :o 

Will keep you posted
Title: Re: New Member Build - with Q's
Post by: Pasty on June 10, 2011, 09:29:02 PM
lets see ya plane!
Title: Re: New Member Build - with Q's
Post by: Gundummy on June 10, 2011, 10:08:51 PM
 :-X errm it's a heli lol,

the big decision is do i use the 500 electric or the 600 nitro.... My mind tells me the 500 as it has a flymentor fitted for ease of hovering and stability but the devil says the 600 nitro for flight time and fun!

I'll test the options this weekend, tweak play and enjoy.... i'll report back soon  :D
Title: Re: New Member Build - with Q's
Post by: Sheldon Holy on June 10, 2011, 10:52:52 PM
OK. 600 nitro or 500 electric.

Plus sides for the glow:

Better flight times.
That's it.

Plus sides for the 500:

Electric-less vibrations (glow helis are a bit bad when it comes to vibration-I put a cam on my Raven 50 and it was OK but I would never use it for FPV).
The 500 has the hover stabilisation thingy-you'll need it as you don't have the spacial awareness to hover with FPV without any stabilisation.

As for the carbon on the heli, I'd extend the wires on the VTx and have the VTx wires going down the tail boom and attach the VTx to the vertical fin thing on the boom at the back. That is the only way you'll get reception.

Hope this helps.

Sheldon
Title: Re: New Member Build - with Q's
Post by: Shikra on June 10, 2011, 11:40:12 PM
Not many have had success with Helis. Liam is abou the only one in UK I have seen post an FPV flight.

The multirotors like Tri's, quads and bigger are much more popular. Also much more efficient for better flight times.

Love to give one a go though.

Title: Re: New Member Build - with Q's
Post by: Gundummy on June 12, 2011, 05:24:52 PM
Firstly, Shikra, Sheldon, thx for the input  :D

Secondly, I took everything out to the field for a test.

Lessons learned here with a wealth of teething problems.


I think that i will stick to the 500 size electric for FPV as there is less carbon and the heli is "more expendable" than my beloved nitro lol

Back to the drawing board!
Title: Re: New Member Build - with Q's
Post by: Sheldon Holy on June 12, 2011, 07:25:25 PM
Hmm... That's weird... 10m you say? I personally have no experience with 5.8, but I have a... Well... Next step up from a 10mW VTx (times 10 by 10, times that by 40, divide that by 20, divide that by 10 and finally times that by 5 and you get my mW), and I was able to walk all the way through the house today with almost no picture drop out whatsoever. However I know you need a higher mW on 5.8 to get the same results as 2.4 E.G. for the same range as 2.4 on 10mW, you will need, I believe, a 100mW or higher 5.8 Tx.

Just check all the antennas are screwed on tightly, replace them if need be, and try again. 10m range sounds more like what you get when there is no ariel connected.

Also, try and make do with what you've got right now until you get it all working. The goggles and cameras will have nothing to do with a dodgy downlink. Also you could try a 900mHz/1.2gHz setup. That would probably work well. But as for the goggles, of course higher resolution with bigger screens is better , but see how yours are. TBH I'd be more inclined to use a screen with helis, as you don't get the same immersive experience as with the goggles, but if you screw up you can look up quicker.

Also, some links to your equipment would be helpful.

Sheldon
Title: Re: New Member Build - with Q's
Post by: Coyote on June 12, 2011, 08:05:06 PM
10m is way short of what you should be getting, somethings very wrong.

Whats your setup ?
Title: Re: New Member Build - with Q's
Post by: Gundummy on June 12, 2011, 10:55:03 PM
 :(

Yes weird indeed. The thing is, when i got home and checked the RX/TX again, the signal seemed 10x more solid and did not drop out while shaking the camera and Tx.

I'm using a 5.8ghz 305 8 channel Rx mounted on a tripod with a 3 cell 2250mah Lipo for power with a 3dbi antenna, and dare i say a 200mw  :+ 5.8Tx powered by a 1000mah 3cell lipo linked to a sony ccd camera again with a 3dbi antenna.

I must have a loose connection somewhere of which i will re-check. I found that even standing in front of the Rx/Tx caused massive signal loss....

I will not give up though lol....  \0/

i will push onwards and upwards to glory !!


Title: Re: New Member Build - with Q's
Post by: Sheldon Holy on June 13, 2011, 05:06:00 PM
Oh it says Video for everything.

We can't even discuss hypothetically!
Title: Re: New Member Build - with Q's
Post by: Coyote on June 13, 2011, 06:43:34 PM
You should be getting 100`s of meters of range with that setup

If you getting a picture, camera and transmitter are working.

That then leaves one of these :

1) Faulty rx

2) Antenna mis-match, ie the antennas connector doesnt match the rx`s or vtx`s

3) Burnt out vtx - Vtx left plugged in, either with no cold air passing over it for a few minutes or without an antenna connected or an antenna with wrong sma end ( female to female )

Title: Re: New Member Build - with Q's
Post by: Gundummy on June 27, 2011, 07:10:29 PM
 :+
Quotei will stick to the 550 size electric for FPV as there is less carbon and the heli is "more expendable" than my beloved nitro

Ok - update here, this is either good or bad karma but i switched from spektrum to futaba Tx and while setting up the 550 managed to spool up the heli in the workshop while setting fail safes of all things.  :o Tail boom and Carbon blades took the hit so i would say:

a: always disconnect the motor when tweaking settings .... this is the one time i didn't! :-X
b: i'm fine but the pride has been dented somewhat!

Now the good Karma .... my 550 has since ceased production, no spares. I just need a non-Carbon Fibre cheap helicopter to map all the electronics across and i'm back in the game  ^-^

Project on hold

I'll be back! 

(Try buying a basic non-bling Helicopter without carbon fibre! It's Ninja!)
Title: Re: New Member Build - with Q's
Post by: Coyote on June 27, 2011, 07:44:28 PM
Oh dear, not to plan at all, ive done the same with my Blade 400 once, it fired up in idle up and mashed itself into the ceiling putting an end to setting up rather quickly :)