FPV HUB

Videos / Pictures => Fixed Wing FPV Videos => Topic started by: mark1975 on June 13, 2015, 11:11:33 AM

Title: fatshark 1.2 vrx vs laser 1.2 vrx results are in
Post by: mark1975 on June 13, 2015, 11:11:33 AM
 :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :(




ill let the video speak for itself
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kooaWU0VB1Q (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kooaWU0VB1Q)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_f-FnCnAskQ (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_f-FnCnAskQ)
Title: Re: fatshark 1.2 vrx vs laser 1.2 vrx results are in
Post by: English Turbines on June 13, 2015, 11:45:17 AM
Too much brightness on the FS setup?......Same day test? with same ambient light conditions? Same Camera settings?

Im no goggle expert BTW, just my 2 pennoth, I cant use goggles, I use an LED Screen, but it looks like a Camera setting may improve it on the FS set-up?

Cheers..Dave.... :vulture:
Title: Re: fatshark 1.2 vrx vs laser 1.2 vrx results are in
Post by: mark1975 on June 13, 2015, 12:16:54 PM
no far from it both same day settings, on the fatshark the picture was unflyable in certain parts I had to throttle up ............not impressed atall
Title: Re: fatshark 1.2 vrx vs laser 1.2 vrx results are in
Post by: English Turbines on June 13, 2015, 01:22:25 PM
Quote from: mark1975 on June 13, 2015, 12:16:54 PM
no far from it both same day settings, on the fatshark the picture was unflyable in certain parts I had to throttle up ............not impressed atall

Yes,  Ive seen the lesser bandwidth of 1.2ghz work pretty well on a plane using goggles, a multirotor is so much more difficult though, stuff too near to each other...It looks pretty bad though, I thought it was just the compressed DVR footage at first......You could try using some of that semi ridgid coax to extend the Skews higher away from the frame....and also on your goggles...to get the skew away from your head, yes, I am serious, the U Tube clip I watched, he claimed it made a difference...water content in your head affects the signal received...No kidding....:)
Title: Re: fatshark 1.2 vrx vs laser 1.2 vrx results are in
Post by: mark1975 on June 13, 2015, 01:40:32 PM
yes I heard of the distance being a factor, you see the last know video of it being tested was done by ryanx down under and he was using a irc vtx 1.2 700mw which is due for release soon the difference was immense compared to mine for now though I cannot use that just not flyable
Title: Re: fatshark 1.2 vrx vs laser 1.2 vrx results are in
Post by: rank on June 13, 2015, 01:52:58 PM
Knowing how ImmersionRc do their business, no big surprises here. But, releasing the new product they should have mentioned the incompatibility with 99.99% 1.3 vtx
Title: Re: fatshark 1.2 vrx vs laser 1.2 vrx results are in
Post by: mark1975 on June 13, 2015, 01:56:17 PM
I had real high hopes also have another en route too from the us lol, but changing all my vtx to irc would be costly
Title: fatshark 1.2 vrx vs laser 1.2 vrx results are in
Post by: Jake Bullit on June 13, 2015, 03:09:52 PM
Another review here

http://youtu.be/x356KKoTRV4
Title: Re: fatshark 1.2 vrx vs laser 1.2 vrx results are in
Post by: English Turbines on June 13, 2015, 03:37:03 PM
Guess you need a matching FS vtx...?....Typical Immersion....The laser receiver looked ok though, why dont you use that one ?
Title: Re: fatshark 1.2 vrx vs laser 1.2 vrx results are in
Post by: mark1975 on June 13, 2015, 04:05:12 PM
hmmm I cannot change values in osd im using core on the disco I might be able to do in the storm osd
Title: Re: fatshark 1.2 vrx vs laser 1.2 vrx results are in
Post by: mark1975 on June 13, 2015, 04:05:50 PM
think I will for the time being no option really just wanted to jump on the irc bandwagon
Title: Re: fatshark 1.2 vrx vs laser 1.2 vrx results are in
Post by: Coyote on June 13, 2015, 04:44:48 PM
Its looking like these are a bad investment as the reviews come in.The pictures are too blown out, no audio, no competition vs the Laser there in your vid Mark. The Laser won hands down.