Airprox Analysis for UAV etc 2016 to Date

Started by BigT, November 21, 2016, 09:19:31 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

SnoozeDoggyDog

I am quite surprised or have missed where someone has mentioned it in the thread already given the experience on this forum ...

I thought the definition of a "drone" was to be able to act autonomously. So your regular FPV uav is not a drone.
Mini Talon with Vector AP
Reptile S800 Sky Shadow

English Turbines

 I think the expression "Drone" was used during Wartime for prop driven Target "Drones".....Used as Gunnery practice targets, and flown by remote control by a Pilot on the deck of the ship.
  In those days, the remote control link would have had valves in it......Although I think even back then, the giro stabiliser had been invented...
  The V2 Rocket used giro stabilised fins for guidance and stability.....It didnt have RTL though......lol.

     :vulture:
Nothing beats the smell of Jet-A at 800 Celsius...:)
Falcon UHF & 1280mhz Video.
SW1900 & Storm.

electrotor

A further prompt reply from the Airproxboard. I must admit to being rather saddened that they quite consciously dumb down the terminology for the general public/press. More fodder for the ignorant I suppose.
The meaning of words changes over time, eg wicked, gay, naughty, etc. Drone has many meanings including pilotless aircraft, sound and a type of person and it seems like we are going to be stuck with this vague terminology for a while. There must be something catchier than drone or FPV we can start educating people with, but that would be for a new thread.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We tend to use the word drone largely because it is the popular vocabulary but also because we don't always get a full description of the air system from reporting pilots.  It can vary from simply describing things as 'drones', 'quadcopter', 'uncertain how many rotors', 'squashed disc-shaped' and so on.  'Drone' is simply employed to indicate an unmanned vehicle.  You are correct, we rarely get a report about whether the UAS has any surveillance equipment on it or not, which as you are aware make a difference as to which rules apply.  However, from time-to-time a pilot has reported seeing a camera. We started out using UAS for 'Unmanned Air System' but that then sounded too technical for the general public/press so we have defaulted to drones unless we have a specific description of 'model glider' or  'fixed-wing' the like when we use that.


Regards

Suzanne Sinclair

Suzanne Sinclair
UK Airprox Board
Inspector
Natibus in luto, caput inter nubila.

Lola

Are google cars are going to be called drones?

FPVSteve

Quotesounded too technical for the general public/press

How about you just stick to the facts and let the general public figure it out for themselves - this is the problem, sugar-coating everything to appeal to everyone. It's the equivalent of Chinese whispers.

Detailed facts become half-truths, then exaggerations, then outright lies, then pictures of celebrities holding a quadcopter in the bath with it tangled in their perfect hair.